Friday, February 18, 2011

History of White People




I got a book for Christmas called The History of White People. The author, Nell Irvin Painter, is Emerita Professor of History at Princeton University. She sets out to show in this book that the concept of ‘one white race’ is a recent historical invention.

Powerful people and institutions wrote history, anthropology, and science in such a way as to uphold their power based on the myth of a pure Anglo-Saxon race. Even my heroes Thomas Jefferson and Ralph Waldo Emerson had a hand in this devious scheme. Emerson looms large as an influence in this mythic white race movement.

Professor Painter starts her history of white people by looking at ancient Greek and Roman history when the concept of ‘race’ did not exist. Not until the 18th century did an obsession with ‘whiteness’ become important. The German invention of the idea of Caucasian beauty came out of the business of buying and selling ‘white’ slaves from the Caucasus region (the land separating the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea). Johann Friedrich Blumenbach’s doctoral dissertation (On the Natural variety of Mankind, 1775) and his subsequent studies introduced in scientific language the notion of a beautiful, white Caucasian race.

Intellectuals like Madame de Stael and Thomas Carlyle spread a theory of the superiority of the ‘white race.’ Left out of this Anglo-Saxon ‘race’ were the Irish and Native Americans, and later the Italians, Jews, Slavs, and Chinese. Immigrants in America were categorized according to their lack of racial purity.

The measurement of skulls, the eugenics movement, and biased intelligence tests were used to differentiate Anglo-Saxons from other ‘races.’

This is a history of how the powerful not only write history, but establish scientific theories and invent cultural stereotypes. There is no such thing as a Caucasian race; nor is there a ‘white race.’ Skin color is a by-product of two kinds of melanin: red to yellow (pheomelanin) and dark brown to black (eumelanin). How much of which sort of melanin people have in their skin—and to what degree it is expressed—depends entirely over time on exposure to the sun’s ultraviolet radiation. Painter writes:

Our species originated in Africa some 1.2 million years ago, evolving from primates like chimpanzees. Chimpanzees, like most other animals, have light skin under dark hair. Shedding that thick coat of hair, humans quickly developed dark skin, and they stayed dark until leaving Africa for cloudier territory about 100,000 years ago, when residence in dark, wintry regions like northern Europe and northern Asia required another color change, this time from dark to light. Light-skinned Europeans and light-skinned Asians lost pigmentation through different genetic processes in Europe and Asia. (p. 395)

The History of White People covers a vast amount of history and science. And it deals with controversial matters. My own bias tends to accept the conclusions of this study. It certainly educated me concerning historical figures and movements that have influenced how we think and how we relate to other people.

It’s interesting that St. Paul tells the people of Athens that “we all come from one blood” (Acts 17). Now we know that our first parents were dark-skinned Africans. (When have you seen the mythical Adam and Eve portrayed as black Africans?) Would it be correct to say that we all started out black, and that some of us have lost our blackness and had to settle for whiteness? 

SO WHAT?

So much of the injustice in the world is caused by racism and fear of the Other—that is, those who are different than us. The solution to these causal factors has to do with being more educated about scientific facts surrounding questions of ‘race’; working toward more equality in terms of economics and social position; and simply getting to know people who are different from us on a personal basis. The ‘mixing’ of the ‘races’ is an important element in finding out that we are all essentially the same. 

Whoever does the defining does the confining.
##

Monday, February 14, 2011

The Radical Enlightenment


I just finished reading Jonathan Israel’s book A Revolution of the Mind: Radical Enlightenment and the Intellectual Origins of Modern Democracy (Princeton University Press, 2010).

His thesis is that during the 18th century, the philosophical movement we call the Enlightenment was divided by two schools of thought. The Moderate Enlightenment thinkers like Voltaire did not want to go as far as to say that monarchies should not remain in place. The Radical Enlightenment thinkers like Diderot, d’Holbach, and Helvetius advocated that Reason mandated the dissolution of all authoritative institutions that stand in the way of total inequality of all people.

The 17th century thinker Baruch Spinoza gave impetus to the Radical side of the new, radical way of viewing reality, with implications for education, religion and politics. Spinoza said that reality is not material and spiritual; rather, everything is material. God is the world, and the world is God; there is nothing else. This is pantheism—a Natural theology. Ethics for Spinoza is all about what is beneficial for the common good. It all boils down to justice.

Jonathan Israel sums up the two schools of Enlightenment thought as Spinoza versus Voltaire; the Radical versus the Moderate. The Moderate thinkers were willing to leave powerful institutions in place and not shake up the status quo. The Radical philosophers wanted to go further.

SO WHAT?

The more I understand the forces that have shaped our world, the more I can understand the forces at work today. Ideas matter. Debate is good. The status quo is hard to budge. I saw this in church after church. To get people and institutions to change is almost impossible. But when peoples’ intellectual assumptions are shaken, change is possible. I wonder how much Enlightenment ideas drove the French Revolution and how much the people’s desperation and hunger influenced it. I suspect that the idea and belief that they had a ‘right’ to revolt gave the needed impetus to act on their hunger.

The belief in universal human rights is a powerful idea. It’s clearly stated in the Charter of the United Nations. That’s one reason the UN is a good institution to have around.

The basic belief in the equality of all people was driven by the Radical Enlightenment, not by the Church. There are times when atheists serve God better than Christians.


8

Wednesday, February 9, 2011

House...Crown

Our architects are finishing up the contract for our house. It should be signed very soon and construction will begin. We had six contractors bid for the job. It still came out much higher than we expected. Oh well.

**

Norah celebrated her third birthday last Saturday. That evening she brought some framed photos to Glory and asked, "Was I in your tummy in this picture?" "Why, yes," said Glory, "you were." Norah pointed to another picture. "Was I in your tummy in this picture?" Glory said, "No, not in that one." "Where was I?" asked Norah. Glory paused then said, "Well, you weren't anywhere." Norah said, "But where was I?" Glory said, "You were not anywhere; you didn't exist then." Norah persisted. "But where was I?" Glory repeats: "Before you were in my tummy you were not you...You didn't exist. That's all I can say." Norah, without missing a beat, said, "I guess it's a mystery."

**

I read a short piece in The Christian Science Monitor recently about the effect of prayer on international politics. Mary Baker Eddy, the founder of Christian Science, gave an interpretation of Psalm 23 in which she identified the Shepherd (in 'the Lord is my shepherd') as Divine Love. She said that Divine Love erases fear, criticism, jealousy, and judgmentalism. Prayer, according to Eddy, can break down the barriers that these characteristics cause in political life. Whether or theory of prayer is correct or not, I was helped by thinking of the Shepherd as Divine Love. I just have trouble relating to the God-image of shepherd. I don't know any shepherd; never have. But being shepherded by Divine Love has meaning for me. Many metaphors or images of God don't register with me anymore. But Divine Love and Divine Intelligence resonates.

**

My book of family stories is about finished. I'm reading the proof copy and making corrections.

**

I joined the gym at our local Community Center. I've not yet used the weight room or any of the zillion exercise machine (though I intend to acquaint myself with some of them). I'm using the indoor track for walking. One day I was going around the track in the usual counter clockwise direction when a man met me coming the other way. "Hey," he said, "didn't you read the sign? This is Tuesday; you're supposed to be going clockwise." "Oh," thanks," I said. Sure enough there is a sign that says we run or walk counter clockwise on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday -- and the opposite direction on the other days. Boy, life is complicated, isn't it?

**

I'm still going to the Dental School at UAB for dental work. Yesterday I got my new crown. Gold! I guess if I get mugged I should keep my mouth shut lest the mugger yank out my shiny crown. It took three hours as usual. The students are thorough and slow. The student didn't numb me before he started. But when I jumped a couple of times he realized I needed an injection. This was the first crown he had put on someone who had not already had a root canal. Thus, my pain helped him learn to numb those who have not been rooted. I try to do my little part in educating the next generation of dentists. I started singing the hymn "Crown Him with Many Crowns," but he didn't get it--he hadn't grown up in a Protestant church.

8

Thursday, February 3, 2011

The Plug



photo by wayne mclaughlin


I thought this fenced-in fire plug was unique. Make sure it doesn't get away--or run away with some hairy dog.

8